我唾弃你的坟墓

黄循财：要打破思维组审慎大胆政府_我的网站

速度与激情6

一 | （新加坡讯）（8月23日）是新加坡总理黄循财接任第100天，他在上任后召开的首场记者会上，阐述第四代领导团队将如何打破一些旧思维，通过新的方式来组建一个“审慎而大胆”的政府。

二 | 黄循财兼任新加坡财政部长，他在上星期天（18日）的新加坡国庆群众大会上强调会捍卫那些对国家有益的基本原则，但同时也会大胆行事，不让过去束缚国家塑造未来的能力。 CANBERRA, Australia -- Opposing campaigners made their final pitches on Friday over changing the Australia's constitution to acknowledge a place for Indigenous Australians on the eve of the nation's first referendum in a generation.The referendum has the potential to amend Australia’s founding legal document for the first time since 1977. But opinion polls suggest that the amendment will be rejected as more than four-in-five referendums have been in the past.Australians are being asked to alter the constitution to recognize the “First Peoples of Australia” by establishing an Indigenous Voice to Parliament.The committee comprised of and chosen by Indigenous Australians would advise the Parliament and government on issues that affect the nation’s most disadvantaged ethnic minority.Indigenous Australians account for only 3.8% of Australia’s population. But they die on average eight years younger than the wider population, have a suicide rate twice that of the national average and suffer from diseases in the remote Outback that have been eradicated from other wealthy countries.Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, a leading Voice advocate, cited the Israel-Hamas war to underscore why Australians should vote “yes” out of kindness toward the Indigenous population.“This week of all weeks where we see such trauma in the world, there is nothing — no cost — to Australians showing kindness, thinking with their heart as well as their head, when they enter the polling booth tomorrow and vote ‘yes,’” Albanese said.“Kindness costs nothing. Thinking of others costs nothing. This is a time where Australians have that opportunity to show the generosity of spirit that I see in the Australian character where at the worst of times we always see the best of the Australian character,” Albanese added.Opposition leader Peter Dutton, whose conservative party opposes the Voice, said polling showing declining support for the referendum over the past year was evidence Albanese failed to convince voters of the benefits of the Voice. “He’s instinctively won their hearts because Australians do want better outcomes for Indigenous Australians, but he hasn’t won their minds,” Dutton told Australian Broadcasting Corp.Indigenous activist Robbie Thorpe drew attention to Indigenous division over the Voice this week by applying for a High Court injunction to stop the referendum. “The referendum is an attack on Aboriginal Sovereignty,” Thorpe said in a statement on Friday.But the High Court said his writ had been rejected on Thursday on the grounds that it appeared to be an abuse of the court process, frivolous, vexatious or outside the court’s jurisdiction.Thorpe is among so-called progressive “no” campaigners who argue an Indigenous committee with no power of veto over legislation is not a sufficiently radical change.Many progressives argue the constitution should more importantly acknowledge that Indigenous Australians never ceded their land to British colonizers and a treaty was a higher priority than a Voice.Conservative “no” campaigners argue the Voice is too radical and the courts could interpret its powers in unpredictable ways.Some Indigenous people don’t have faith that the Voice’s membership would represent their diverse priorities.“Yes” campaigner Kyam Maher, an Indigenous man who is South Australia state’s attorney general, said the question he was most often asked by thousands of voters was what result Indigenous Australians wanted.“I can say absolutely and overwhelmingly Aboriginal people want their fellow Australians to vote ‘yes’ tomorrow,” Maher said.An opinion poll published this week supported Maher's view that a majority of Indigenous Australians wanted the Voice although that support had eroded since early 2023.Polling suggests the referendum will lose despite Australia’s peak legal, business, faith and sporting groups overwhelmingly supporting the Voice.Anne Twomey, a Sydney University constitutional law expert and a member of the Constitutional Expert Group that advised the government on drafting the referendum question, said she feared that Australian lawmakers might give up trying to change the constitution if the referendum fails.“I think it is a big concern if we end up with a constitution that’s frozen in time that we can’t change,” Twomey said.“In practice around the world, when a constitution becomes frozen and out of date with the world that it operates in, it becomes brittle and when there’s ever any stress on it, it does tend to break,” she added.___Follow AP's Asia-Pacific coverage at https://apnews.com/hub/asia-pacific。他在记者会上回答《联合早报》提问时说，这是一种“平衡的艺术”，人们必须审视哪些基本原则仍适用，哪些是必须坚持，如多元文化、自力更生的精神，及以家庭为重。上任新加坡总理100天的黄循财强调，要打破思维组审慎大胆政府。他在回应有关如何鼓励新加坡人多生育的问题时，就充分地体现了这一点。他说，过往的做法较着重于派发婴儿花红，但现在除了直接奖励外，政府也会投入资源打造一个亲家庭的环境。这意味着，要关注许多年轻父母和家庭重视的问题，像是学前教育和教育，以及假期安排，因为他们希望能多陪伴孩子，尤其是在孩子的婴儿时期。国庆群众大会的新宣布，就包括给予父母多10周的父母共用产假（Shared Parental Leave），以及为失业的中低收入者提供短期财务援助。

制定技能创前程求职援助计划

多年来，新加坡政府一直对援助失业者有所保留，因为担心这可能导致他们过于依赖政府，不思进取。针对这一点，黄循财说，这层担忧不无道理，所以花了很多时间考虑这个问题，最终找到平衡点，制定了技能创前程求职援助计划（SkillsFuture Jobseeker Support）。在力求改变的当儿，虽然得有一些权衡取舍，但他认为，眼前的情况、条件和新加坡人对这些取舍的看法也许已经不同了，或是可能有了新的技术和解决方案。因此在各个领域和各项政策上，都应该持续探讨怎么为新加坡和新加坡人做得更好。

三 |

制定新方向

对于过去3个多月的工作重点，黄循财最优先探讨的，是制定带领国家在下个阶段继续前进的新方向，并设想这对新加坡人而言有何意义？换了新领导人和新政府代表什么？在思考这些事情时，他以去年总结的新加坡携手前进运动作为参照。他说，当时已经明确了我国下个阶段的共同目标。支撑这一切的两个支柱是：一、更新后的社会契约，在这个契约中，每名新加坡人在遇到困难时都会获得支持，也能得到平等的机会，但人们也须全力以赴。